> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.stakingrewards.com/verified-provider-program/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.stakingrewards.com/verified-provider-program/transparency-and-governance/faqs.md).
# FAQs
Learn more about the Staking Rewards Infra Ratings (formerly VSP)
What are the Staking Rewards Infra Ratings?
The Staking Rewards Infra Ratings (formerly Verified Staking Provider - VSP) is an independent due diligence framework assessing staking infrastructure providers across:
* Business Operations
* Security Setup
* Operational Reliability
Providers that meet predefined verification standards receive a verified status and rating (AAA–D).
The framework increases transparency and standardization in validator evaluation, enabling institutional and professional delegators to make informed allocation decisions.
If you are ready to get your Staking Provider verified, you can [submit the application form.](https://www.stakingrewards.com/ratings/staking-providers)
What does the Infra Rating assess?
Infra Ratings evaluate three core pillars:
#### Security Setup
Key management architecture, infrastructure design, internal controls, incident response procedures, and operational resilience.
#### Reliability
Historical uptime, slashing history, validator performance, and operational consistency.
#### Business Operations
Legal structure, delegator protection, sustainability of operations, governance processes, and transparency practices.
Additional ecosystem contributions are reflected separately and do not influence the core rating.
How is the rating structured?
Each provider receives a rating:
* **AAA** – Exceeds verification standards
* **AA** – Strongly meets standards
* **A** – Meets standards
* **B** – Partially meets standards
* **C** – Fails to meet multiple standards
* **D** – High operational risk
Only providers rated **A or above** qualify for verified status.
How is this different from on-chain metrics?
On-chain data reflects validator performance only.
Infra Ratings assess operational and structural risks that are not visible on-chain, including:
* Internal security practices
* Business continuity planning
* Governance structure
* Organizational maturity
These factors materially affect counterparty and operational risk.
Why should a staking provider apply for Infra Ratings?
Infra Ratings provide:
**Independent credibility**\
An external, structured assessment of operational standards.
**Differentiation**\
Clear positioning versus non-verified providers.
**Institutional visibility**\
Improved discoverability among foundations, custodians, and professional allocators who prioritize risk transparency.
**Standardization**\
Alignment with emerging industry best practices.
**Top-of-funnel exposure**\
Visibility through Staking Rewards’ organic traffic and data platform.
For providers targeting institutional mandates, verification strengthens trust signaling in a competitive validator landscape.
If you are ready to get your Staking Provider verified, you can [submit the application form.](https://www.stakingrewards.com/ratings/staking-providers)
Does verification improve delegation flow?
Infra Ratings are a trust and transparency framework - not a marketing guarantee.
Delegation decisions are influenced by multiple factors including:
* Network performance
* Foundation relationships
* Geographic distribution
* Additional services
However, verified status supports due diligence processes and removes friction in institutional validator selection.
Is there a conflict of interest?
No.
Staking Rewards does not operate validators and does not compete with staking providers.
This structural neutrality allows for standardized, cross-provider assessment without allocation bias.
What is the application process?
The verification process is straightforward:
1. **Submit an application form**\
Provide basic information about your organization, infrastructure, and operations. [Submit the application form.](https://www.stakingrewards.com/ratings/staking-providers)
2. **Introductory call with the Ratings team**\
A short call to:
* Confirm eligibility
* Explain the assessment process
* Answer any questions
3. **Sign the service agreement and pay the fee (if applicable)**\
The assessment begins after the agreement is signed and payment is received.
What does it cost?
Fees are determined relative to Assets under Management (AuM) and reflect the operational cost of conducting structured due diligence.
Fees do not influence rating outcomes.
Please find the [Pricing Tiers here.](https://docs.stakingrewards.com/verified-provider-program/~/revisions/YtpJAnZ7vSHiLzYEdZUG/pricing/pricing-tiers)
How often are providers reassessed?
Verified providers are reassessed annually.
Material operational changes must be disclosed. Failure to maintain standards may result in rating downgrade or removal of verified status.
Does verification guarantee performance or safety?
No.
Infra Ratings are a due diligence reference framework.\
They do not provide insurance or performance guarantees.
Delegators remain responsible for independent risk assessment.
Is this an audit?
No.
Infra Ratings are structured due diligence assessments.\
They do not include penetration testing or direct infrastructure audits.
Can I access confidential documentation?
No.
Providers submit sensitive information under NDA.\
Public profiles reflect the outcome of assessment, not underlying confidential documents.
Why should I trust Staking Rewards to Verify Staking Providers?
Since 2017, Staking Rewards has been researching and assessing the staking industry. Through our experience working with hundreds of Staking Providers, we have determined the best standards and practices in the staking industry.
As a prominent staking Data Provider, we offer unbiased information about staking protocols and Providers. We do not offer competing staking services, allowing us to serve as a reliable resource for stakers.
Legal Disclaimer
Infra Ratings are informational only and do not constitute investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice.
Staking involves risk, including slashing and loss of rewards. Delegators should conduct independent due diligence before making allocation decisions.
---
# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.
## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation by asking a question.
Perform an HTTP GET request on the following URL with the `ask` and `goal` query parameters:
```
GET https://docs.stakingrewards.com/verified-provider-program/transparency-and-governance/faqs.md?ask=&goal=
```
`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is what the user is ultimately trying to achieve, the reason they need the answer. Sharing it helps GitBook give you a better, more relevant answer. A goal is most helpful when it describes the outcome the user wants rather than restating the question. For example, with `ask=how do I create an API token`, a goal like `automate deployments from our CI pipeline` lets GitBook tailor the answer to that use case.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.
Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.